FT
FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC (FARO)·Q2 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 revenue was $82.1M, down 7% YoY; GAAP EPS was -$0.03 and non-GAAP EPS was $0.18, with gross margin expanding to 54.6% (non-GAAP 55.0%) and adjusted EBITDA at $8.4M (10.3% margin), all ahead of internal margin/earnings guidance despite softer top line .
- Results benefited from variable cost productivity, supply chain localization, and incremental pricing; APAC (China) demand remained challenged, while software and service showed resilience .
- S&P Global consensus estimates for Q2 2024 were unavailable; public sources indicate a revenue miss (~$82.1M vs ~$83.65M) and EPS beat (GAAP EPS -$0.03 vs estimates in the -$0.35 to $0.01 range), suggesting a positive surprise on profitability and margin execution amid revenue headwinds .
- Management guided Q3 revenue to $76–$84M, non-GAAP gross margin 53.5–55.0%, non-GAAP OpEx $40–$42M, and non-GAAP EPS of -$0.01 to $0.19; tone remained confident on operational leverage, with ongoing caution on China and normal EMEA seasonality .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “We exceeded our targets on all items within our control… Non-GAAP gross margin was 55%, up 300 bps sequentially… Non-GAAP OpEx $40M… Adjusted EBITDA $8.4M (10.3% of sales)… third straight quarter of operating cash flow generation” (CEO) .
- Gross margin upside vs guidance driven by “acceleration of variable cost productivity, supply chain localization… logistics, mix and price,” producing ~300 bps sequential improvement and the highest quarterly level since 2021 (CFO) .
- Solution strategy traction: Orbis mobile scanner double-digit YoY revenue growth; new Sphere XG workflow improved customer productivity; notable migrations to Sphere XG with planned 360 TB by end of Q3 (CEO) .
What Went Wrong
- Top-line softness: total sales down 7% YoY; hardware down 12% YoY, with APAC revenue down >20% YoY due to China weakness; discretionary CapEx caution in construction .
- Seasonality and macro: management expects normal EMEA seasonality in Q3 and continued demand challenges in China, constraining near-term revenue trajectory despite margin improvements .
- GAAP profitability remains negative at the net income level in Q2 (-$0.5M, -$0.03 per share), emphasizing reliance on non-GAAP profitability and cost actions while organic growth initiatives roll out .
Financial Results
Segment revenue mix:
Regional sales:
KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Q2 guidance vs actual (from Q1):
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We exceeded our targets on all items within our control… Non-GAAP gross margin was 55%… Adjusted EBITDA was $8.4M or 10.3%… third straight quarter of operating cash flow generation, a first since 2019.” .
- CFO: “Most of the upside [vs gross margin guide] came from acceleration of variable cost productivity… supply chain localization… logistics… mix and price layered in gives you that 3% incremental.” .
- CEO on growth: “We firmly believe there are opportunities to leverage FARO's technology and innovation beyond the markets we currently serve… begin introducing these products to the market… bullish about our prospects in the next several years.” .
- CEO on China: “Biggest issue right here right now is in China… manufacturing and construction… that’s the bulk driving lack of revenue growth.” .
- CFO on Q3 outlook: “We expect third quarter revenue $76–$84M… non-GAAP gross margin 53.5–55%… non-GAAP OpEx $40–$42M… non-GAAP EPS -$0.01 to $0.19.” .
Q&A Highlights
- Macro and guidance cadence: Management sees Q3 guide as achievable with July tracking in line; macro remains challenged with discretionary CapEx caution, notably in construction .
- Gross margin drivers: Upside came from localization, logistics, mix and pricing; $12M annualized savings from supply chain localization are “middle innings” and not linear .
- Capital allocation: Repurchased $3M convertible debt; $18M remaining share buyback authorization; will deploy improving cash flows where returns are best; noted stock was down after-hours .
- China outlook: No near-term rebound expected; year-over-year comps should ease in H2’24; persistent weakness across manufacturing and construction .
- Product contribution: Orbis and Sphere XG showing strong adoption; continuous releases and data migrations underscore SaaS traction .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for FARO in Q2 2024 were unavailable due to missing mapping; therefore, estimate comparisons are not anchored to SPGI and are not included.
- External sources indicate a revenue miss and EPS beat: Revenue $82.1M versus ~$83.65M estimate (≈1.9% miss); GAAP EPS -$0.03 versus estimates ranging from -$0.35 to $0.01 (beat), and non-GAAP EPS $0.18 above guidance .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin and cash execution are the core upside: non-GAAP GM 55.0% (+300 bps seq), non-GAAP OpEx $40.0M, adjusted EBITDA margin 10.3%, and third straight quarter of operating cash flow—evidence of structural cost progress .
- Top-line risk persists in APAC, especially China; investors should expect continued choppiness and normal EMEA seasonality, biases that could cap near-term revenue despite improving mix (software/service) .
- Product roadmap/solutions (Orbis, Sphere XG) are increasingly a differentiator; accelerating SaaS migrations and workflow enhancements support recurring revenue expansion and multi-year growth drivers .
- Q3 setup: Guide implies flat-to-down revenue vs Q2, but profitability guardrails remain intact (non-GAAP GM 53.5–55.0%, non-GAAP OpEx $40–$42M), sustaining the earnings/cash narrative even if macro is softer .
- Capital deployment optionality: with $97.9M cash/ST investments and operational cash generation, flexibility exists between debt repurchase and buybacks under the remaining $18M authorization—monitor subsequent announcements .
- Trading lens: EPS/margin beats vs revenue misses can lead to mixed stock reactions; focus on sequential margin/cash momentum and visibility on China normalization; watch for product launch catalysts in H2’24 that could aid revenue re-acceleration .
- Risk factors: macro-driven discretionary CapEx, China exposure, and execution on supply chain localization/price realization; ongoing restructuring/integration and tax adjustments impact GAAP/Non-GAAP bridges—model with care .